The word "motives" in the article's title refers to that which may motivate man-concerning his optional acting and the goal that would make his acting be characterized by wisdom and being far from absurdity-towards establishing a divine ontological viewpoint, which tells about the doctrinal dimension, and moves in the way of ideological viewpoint deduction. Therefore, studying the search for the divine ontological viewpoint is concerned with the research motives, through which reason realizes the need to establish a doctrinal view, so that both the optional dimension and the teleological dimension remain preserved within that motivity, in a way that it would not be possible to dismantle between the motives, in the aforementioned sense, and the goal on which all human actions are based, including the motivation towards the divine ontological viewpoint on the one hand, and on the other hand, putting an end to the confusion between two types of motives; the first: is the Research motives, and the second is the Confirmative motives, so that we might explore the negative results when not distinguishing between the tow. This has led to a set of hypotheses, such as the hypothesis of fear, ignorance and others, considering them as research motives towards the establishment of the divine ontological viewpoint, which is far from being so.In this article, I have followed the mental and critical analysis approach in reviewing opinions and theories in the context of talking about the motives for establishing the divine ontological viewpoint.